For yourself
Maintain competence, discipline and readiness.

Military rank is an official status, while daily responsibility is also shaped by appointment, competence and specific duties.
Rank and appointment exist not simply to display hierarchy but to define authority, accountability and the expected level of responsibility. A person in a larger role may be responsible not only for their own action but also for organising others, allocating resources, checking results and making timely decisions. That means more information to consider and wider consequences when something goes wrong. Professional growth should therefore be connected to readiness for more complex duties rather than only to the symbol of status. A strong leader or senior specialist demonstrates competence, predictability and the ability to explain decisions.
A well-defined role answers three questions: what the person must do, which decisions they may make independently and when they must involve a senior or another specialist. Unclear boundaries create two opposite risks—inaction because “this is not mine” or excessive independence where approval is required. Training should therefore explain decision boundaries as well as procedures. Those boundaries can expand with experience, but accountability expands with them. Understanding limits does not reduce initiative; it allows people to act faster inside the authorised space and escalate issues promptly when they move beyond it.
Formal authority to make a decision does not guarantee that the team will regard it as professional. Trust develops when a leader understands context, listens to specialists, acknowledges uncertainty, explains priority and consistently owns the consequences. This does not mean every decision requires a long group discussion. Time may be limited, but available information should still be used and obvious risk should not be ignored. Review after execution also affects trust: if a decision proved weak, it should be analysed and corrected rather than defended simply because of the author’s status.
Preparation for a senior appointment begins long before the formal change. It is useful to practise planning small processes, recording key decisions, giving clear feedback, teaching less experienced colleagues and understanding how your work affects adjacent fields. Mentoring allows wider responsibility to be tried with access to correction. Delegation matters as well; a larger role does not mean doing everything personally. Good leadership creates conditions in which people understand the objective, have sufficient resources, know their decision limits and can report a problem before it becomes critical.
A senior role often includes creating conditions in which less experienced specialists become stronger. This does not require controlling every step forever. The leader sets the standard, provides enough practice, checks critical points and gradually expands independence. If every difficult decision remains with one person, the team never builds a reserve of competence. Passing on knowledge and preparing another person for greater responsibility are part of professional continuity and reduce dependence on a single “irreplaceable” specialist.
Maintain competence, discipline and readiness.
Organize work and verify the result.
Develop the team, identify risks and act fairly.
Perform current duties consistently.
See interdependent roles and the effects of decisions.
Explain purpose, listen and provide feedback.
Do not transfer the consequences of your decisions to others.
Return to career and development opportunities.